Court Gives Lawyers a Draft Playbook for AI, Confidentiality, and Work Product

Kirkland’s May 20 analysis covers a Colorado federal court order in Morgan v. V2X addressing AI use in litigation. The court allowed AI use under protective-order safeguards, held that a pro se litigant’s AI-assisted litigation prep could receive work-product protection, but required disclosure of the AI tool’s identity. The adopted language bars parties from putting confidential information into AI tools unless the provider contractually blocks training/storage misuse, limits third-party disclosure, and permits deletion. Protective orders may now need AI-specific clauses, especially around enterprise vs. consumer tools.

Click here for the official article/release

Disclaimer

The Legal Wire takes all necessary precautions to ensure that the materials, information, and documents on its website, including but not limited to articles, newsletters, reports, and blogs (“Materials”), are accurate and complete. Nevertheless, these Materials are intended solely for general informational purposes and do not constitute legal advice. They may not necessarily reflect the current laws or regulations. The Materials should not be interpreted as legal advice on any specific matter. Furthermore, the content and interpretation of the Materials and the laws discussed within are subject to change.

AI was used to generate part or all of this content - more information

Also Read:  UK technology secretary urges UK public to embrace AI as government makes first £500m fund investment